Home Blog Page 9

Community Pulse – Move Your Way: Finding the Workout That Fits You

Frieda Schweky

Spring has sprung and I have a pep in my step. Do I credit that to the sun finally shining, or my ability to leave the house without a ski mask? Possibly. But honestly, I think the real reason is that I spent all winter going to the gym two to four times a week and lifting heavy weights – and it shows. Not just physically, but mentally, too. For the first time since I was a child, I don’t feel the need to take stimulants to manage my ADHD, and I really think I have working out to thank for that.

Here’s the thing about exercise that doesn’t get talked about enough: it’s not just about how you look. Consistently moving your body has real, measurable benefits that kick in almost immediately. In the short term, even a single workout can boost your mood, sharpen your focus, and reduce stress thanks to a flood of endorphins. Long term, regular physical activity lowers your risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers, strengthens your bones and joints, improves sleep quality, and has been shown to significantly reduce anxiety and depression.

When I’m on my game, I find it hard to imagine people who think physical exertion just isn’t for them. And I get it, I really do, because I used to be one of those people.

I was a full-on couch potato when I was younger. Then, one day my friend Jeanette invited me to a kickboxing class. Thinking nothing of it, I tagged along.  And I was shocked to discover it was actually fun. I signed up for a membership and started working out for the first time in my life. Am I still into kickboxing? No. But that class lit a bulb in my head that’s never gone out. Working out can be enjoyable if you just find what’s right for you.

Over the years I went through plenty of phases – yoga, Orangetheory [a fitness program that combines full-body strength training with heart-pumping cardio], I even tried spin because my dad has been obsessed with spinning my whole life and still is (it was not for me, sorry Dad). These days my thing is CrossFit. I love lifting heavy weights. It’s satisfying in a way that’s hard to explain, and it’s pretty cool that I’m essentially learning an Olympic sport in the process. Plus, I can carry all my groceries in one trip, which might be the greatest practical benefit of all.

Through all those phases I figured out two things. One: you have to love what you do, or you will quit. Two: you need to give something at least a month of consistent effort before you decide whether it’s for you. Your body needs time to adjust. Once the initial soreness fades and you stop dreading it, that’s when you can actually tell if something clicks for you.

I wanted to inspire other members of our community to get moving, so I asked my Instagram followers what they enjoy doing for exercise. Here’s what they had to say.

Natalie Habaz

Natalie has always been active, but her relationship with movement has evolved beautifully over the decades. She started dance training at 16, doing intensives at Broadway Dance Center through her twenties, then shifted to cardio and light weights, then yoga and weights as she got older. Today she teaches dance, choreography, and restorative somatic work, focused on nervous system regulation. And she still takes choreography classes herself.

“The benefits I focus on are more mental than physical – pushing through limits, resilience techniques and regulation. I think the way to look at consistency is: baby steps into often steps into consistency, which then just becomes routine. Also, work out for the feeling it gives you – empowerment, not looks.”

Violet Bernknopf

Violet found her groove with reformer Pilates – five days a week for the past few years, at 5:30am.

“I sneak out and I’m back before my kids even miss me! It keeps me sane. It’s my version of self-care.”

Violet has a bad back with herniated discs, so the low-impact nature of Pilates was a major draw, but the results have been anything but low-impact: toning, strength, and flexibility all over. Her tip? Go early. First she tried nights, but between the kids and general exhaustion, it wasn’t sticking. Now it’s just her routine – and she genuinely misses it when she can’t go.

Melissa Mora

Melissa loves yoga, and she’s the first to admit she came into it as a skeptic.

“In the beginning I kind of mocked it and didn’t think it would help me or even be considered exercise. And then I saw it transform my life.”

Melissa says yoga tones her more than free weights ever did, while simultaneously de-stressing and energizing her.

It [yoga] forces optimal breathing, resilience, flexibility, and positivity. But most importantly it fosters grace within yourself. I can’t think of any other exercise, activity, or sport that does ALL of that.”

Jacklyn Gabbay

Jacklyn doesn’t follow a set routine – she follows her gut.

“I go based off my mood,” she says. When she wants something grounding and a little challenging, she goes for a hike, which is good for her mind, body, and soul. And it gives her some time to talk to Hashem. When she wants high energy, she does dance cardio. When she wants to slow down and get out of her head, she turns to yoga. And sometimes, like during the two week Pesach break, she mixes it up entirely – dance one day, aerial yoga the next (yes, aerial yoga, where you can do flips in the air, which sounds like an absolute blast).

But Jacklyn’s fitness journey didn’t start from a place of fun. It started from a place of pain. Around 2020, her close friend was diagnosed with cancer, and Jacklyn was devastated. She was so distraught she couldn’t even eat. She needed somewhere to put all of that emotion, so she threw herself into physical activity, starting with weight training.

“Instead of being depressed on the couch, I found this beneficial outlet. I felt more connected to my body.” Jacklyn began losing weight without even realizing it, because she wasn’t focused on her appearance, she was focused on taking charge of her life. And that shift turned out to be more important than she knew, because it was around this time that she discovered she was dealing with a health issue herself.

So, what’s the takeaway?

Movement looks different for everyone. It can be hikes and heavy lifts, reformer Pilates early in the morning, or aerial yoga on a whim. It’s kickboxing classes you stumble into and yoga practices you initially roll your eyes at. It’s dancing since you were two years old and weight training through one of the hardest seasons of your life. There is no single right answer – just the one that works for you.

What all of these women have in common isn’t a specific workout or a perfect schedule. It’s that they found something that made them feel good, and they kept showing up. Some days that means discipline, and some days that’s just listening to your body and doing what it needs. Both are valid.

If you’ve been on the fence about getting moving, let this be your nudge. You don’t have to love it on day one. Give it a month. Try the weird class your friend invites you to. Go for the hike. Sign up for the thing that intimidates you a little. The shift for your mind, your body, and your whole life might surprise you.

And if all else fails – at the very least, you’ll be able to carry all your groceries in one trip. Trust me, it’s worth it!

Signing off until next time,

Frieda Schweky!

Frieda is an event and portrait photographer. Check Frieda out on Instagram @friedaschwekyphoto. For photography inquiries or article topic suggestions email her at friedaschweky@gmail.com.

Building Dreams Together – The Gift of Being Seen

 Jack Gindi

Many of us think appreciation is something we give because someone did something for us. They helped. They supported. They solved a problem.

So we say thank you.

But over time, I’ve learned that real appreciation is not about what someone does. It’s about who they are. It’s about recognizing the quiet, consistent presence of someone who showed up – especially when it mattered most.

Fifty Years of Presence

I met my wife, Meredith, when I was a teenager, and we got married young. She has been by my side for over 50 years. When I think about appreciation, I don’t think about a list of things she’s done. I think about something much simpler.

She stayed.

Through the highs and the lows… through seasons of growth and seasons of challenge… she stood beside me. The truth is, we don’t always stop to acknowledge that kind of presence. We get used to it. We assume it. We move past it.

But presence is not a small thing. It may be the greatest gift a person can give.

The People Who See Us

I’ve experienced this in other relationships as well. My oldest brother has been one of those people in my life. Not because of one big moment, but because of how he consistently showed up.

When I struggled, he stepped in. When I needed direction, he guided me. When I doubted myself, he believed in me.

Looking back, what I appreciate most isn’t what he did. It’s that he saw me. He stood beside me.
He was there. And that kind of presence shapes a life.

The Moments That Stay

A friend shared a story with me that sits with me today.

When she was in third grade, she struggled in class while the other children seemed to understand everything easily. One day, a little girl leaned over and quietly helped her.

She was not looking for anything in return – not attention, tot a reward, with no expectation. She  just performed a simple act of kindness.

Years later, they crossed paths again. My friend stopped her and said, “I want you to know, I’ve never forgotten that moment. You saw me when I needed it most.”

One small moment. One person taking the time to see another. And it stayed with her for a lifetime.

What We Often Miss

That’s the part we overlook. We think appreciation has to be tied to something big or measurable. But often, it’s the smallest things that matter most.

People show up every day. They carry more than we see. They give in ways that are quiet, consistent, and easy to overlook.

And because it’s consistent, we begin to expect it. Because we expect it, we stop acknowledging it.

What Our Children Learn

Our children are always watching, not just what we say, but what we notice.

When we take the time to appreciate someone out loud… when we acknowledge who a person is, not just what they’ve done… we teach something deeper than manners.

We teach awareness. We teach respect. We teach them how to truly see people. And when that’s missing, something important is lost.

A Simple Practice

Try this for the next 30 days.

Each day, reach out to one person in your life. A parent. A friend. A sibling. A teacher. Anyone. Tell them something you appreciate about who they are, not just what they’ve done. Don’t expect anything back.

Just notice what happens.

Notice how it feels to say it. Notice how it changes the way you see people. Notice how it shifts your day.

The Gift That Remains

In the end, appreciation isn’t about the moment. It’s about what remains. The gift of being seen may be the greatest gift we can give another person.

Don’t wait for the perfect time. Don’t wait for the right words.

Just say it. Onwards together – with love and gratitude.

From the Files of the Bet Din – The Rightful Heir

The Case

Jack wrote a handwritten last will and testament back in 2007. Upon his passing in 2019, the will was found with Jack’s papers in his safety deposit box.  The will was not prepared by a lawyer nor was it notarized or signed by witnesses. Jack simply affixed his signature to the bottom of a briefly written statement. In the will, Jack offered to gift his private home to the child that provides full-time room and board for his son Joey, a special child. In 2007 when Jack wrote the will his only daughter was not yet married. In 2019, prior to Jack’s passing, his daughter, then married, took Joey into her home for nearly six months before sending him off to a facility that provides for all of Joey’s needs. Jack’s daughter and son-in-law presented the handwritten document to our Bet Din claiming that their father legally gifted them his home since they provided room and board for Joey. Jack’s two sons acknowledged that they were aware of the document their father wrote before their sister provided room and board for their brother Joey, but they were nevertheless unwilling to transfer the property over to their sister.  The two brothers defended that it was not their father’s intent to gift his daughter the home for a mere six months of room and board. They explained that back in 2007 the circumstances were different and there was a real concern for Joey’s welfare.

Who should inherit the father’s home? How should the Bet Din rule and why?

Torah Law

According to the ruling of the Shulhan Aruch, a last will and testament must detail that the heirs of an estate will effectively receive their awards prior to the passing of the benefactor. The underlying reasoning is that one cannot gift another person unless he is still alive. In the absence of a halachically valid will, the assets of an estate are distributed according to standard biblical law as specified in our Torah.

A premier halachic authority proposes that although a will prepared in accordance with civil law generally does not comply with the above requirement, it is nevertheless viewed as halachically binding.

Hence, although a civil will clearly bequeaths the assets of an estate only after death, since the document is enforceable in a civil court it is rendered in a Bet Din as a binding transaction. Although it is technically invalid, the practice of preparing such a will is so widespread and is so powerfully effective in court, it waives the above halachic requirement.

In short, according to this novel opinion, a legal last will and testament prepared by a lawyer and collectable in court is halachically valid. It is important to note, that although some earlier sages agree with this view, many other halachic authorities render a civil will as null and void.

Needless to say, even according to the aforementioned view, if the will is prepared improperly and is not even enforceable in a civil court, it is rendered null and void.

By rule of the Shulhan Aruch, a written text found in the possession of the deceased listing the estates distribution, is not an enforceable document.  Although the text is written and signed by the deceased, since it is not signed by witnesses nor delivered to a third party, there is a concern that perhaps in the interim, the estate owner changed his mind about the distribution.  Witnesses and notaries attest to the will giver’s intent and commitment to the distribution. Additionally, transferring the text to a lawyer for execution or to the estate’s beneficiary is an indication of the benefactor’s final decision with regard to the estate distribution. Therefore, in the absence of the above requirements a written text is invalid.

A Bet Din is required to analyze any conditions stipulated by a benefactor prior to awarding a beneficiary. Too often beneficiaries tend to believe that they fulfilled the stipulated conditions even though they did not. 

VERDICT: An Equal Distribution

Our Bet Din ruled in favor of Jack’s two sons by denying Jack’s daughter sole inheritance of his private home. As mentioned in Torah law, the written statement found in Jack’s safety deposit box does not constitute a valid last will and testament. Since the statement was not signed by witnesses, nor was it transferred to a third party to execute, it is halachically and legally rendered null and void. Furthermore, there is concern that perhaps Jack changed his mind with regard to the transfer of his private home to the care provider of his son Joey.  Jack did not submit the text to his lawyer since his special child Joey was already older and no longer needed significant homecare. The two sons contested their sister’s preposterous claim by bringing evidence that they as well hosted Joey for numerous weeks at a time. They explained that by no means is that grounds to solely inherit the private home.

Hence, our Bet Din referred to an earlier notarized will, that was signed by witnesses, which distributed all of Jack’s assets without distinction into three equal parts. Jack’s  two sons and his daughter were instructed to equally share all of  his estate including his private home.

In Loving Memory of Vera Bat Carol, A”H

YOU BE THE JUDGE

Another Inheritance Dispute

Joan, the eldest child of her beloved father, testified that months before his passing, he said that he wished to gift her younger sister, Sherry, a sum of $100,000 from his estate. For many years, Sherry selflessly tended to all of her father’s complex medical needs. Their three brothers presented the last will and testament to our Bet Din, which allocated to each of the three sons 25 percent of the estate, with Joan and Sherry to receive 12.5 percent each. Upon Joan’s testimony the three brothers responded that they never heard of such a baseless claim. The brothers explained that the reason their father gave each daughter 12.5 percent was in recognition of Sherry’s dedication. Joan was gifted her percentage only on the account of Sherry, as their father did not want to leave her out of the distribution. The brothers suggested that perhaps Joan and Sherry conspired against them to collect an additional $100,000, since this is the first time they heard of the extravagant gift. Joan emphatically reinstated her claim and added that Sherry and her husband were in deep debt and struggling. Joan claimed that it was their father’s last wish to help Sherry with an additional sum of money.

Is Sherry entitled to an additional $100,000 from the estate?

How should the Bet Din rule and why?

Anna Augusta: Where Couture Becomes Personal

Jenna Ashkenazie

In a world where fashion often moves fast, Anna Augusta has built something rare – an experience that feels truly personal. For over a decade in New York, she has been creating gowns with care, precision, and a deep understanding of each woman – where every dress becomes a true reflection of the client.

Born in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, Anna is inspired by the rich history of the ancient Silk Road – a place where cultures, styles, and traditions came together. This influence can be felt in her designs, which combines timeless beauty with a modern, elegant touch. Her journey to New York began in an international environment, arriving in the United States as the spouse of a representative at her country’s mission to the United Nations. Being surrounded by different cultures and perspectives helped shape her unique approach to design – one that feels both global and deeply personal. 

One-on-One Personal and Expert Guidance

What makes Anna Augusta truly special is the experience she offers her clients. In today’s world, it is very rare to work directly with a couture-level designer. At Anna Augusta, every bride is personally guided through the entire process, with Anna acting not only as a designer, but also as a trusted fashion consultant. Each gown begins with a thoughtful conversation – not just about measurements, but about personality, style, lifestyle, and the overall vision for the wedding day.

From there, the bride becomes part of the creative journey, actively participating in shaping her gown. Together, they refine every detail, ensuring the final design feels authentic, personal, and perfectly aligned with the woman who will wear it. This personal attention makes all the difference. Every gown becomes more than just a dress – it becomes a statement of the woman wearing it. The result is something truly unique, created with care, intention, and artistry. For Anna’s clients, this is not just a service – it is a seamless, stress-free experience and a truly memorable journey. 

This approach is what has made Anna Augusta so loved and trusted among her clients. Her gowns stand out not because they follow trends, but because they reflect real women and real stories.

Future Expansion

With the opening of BUY GOWN, Anna Augusta made her designs more accessible for women who need a beautiful dress right away. Clients can choose from a curated collection of wedding and evening gowns available for purchase or rent – while still enjoying high quality and thoughtful design. As demand continues to grow, Anna is preparing to expand into New Jersey, making it easier for clients across New Jersey and Pennsylvania to experience her work. At the same time, there is an influx of retail stores that are showing interest in carrying Anna Augusta designs, recognizing the uniqueness and craftsmanship behind each piece.

 Looking ahead, Anna Augusta plans to grow into a leading designer and manufacturer of modest and plus-size gowns, bringing elegance and attention to detail to a wider range of women. She is also expanding her evening wear collections, offering both one-of-a-kind couture pieces and ready-to-wear designs – so her clients can always feel stylish and confident.  In a time when everything moves at a rapid pace, Anna Augusta offers something truly special: personal attention, true craftsmanship, a seamless, stress-free experience, and gowns that are not just worn – but deeply felt.

A Pattern That Can No Longer Be Ignored

On March 17, Allenhurst held its monthly town hall meeting. What unfolded was not routine civic discussion, but something more revealing: a series of firsthand accounts from Jewish residents describing experiences of exclusion, hostility, and discrimination that, until now, had largely gone unspoken.

For years, many in the community have described carrying quieter versions of these moments – interactions that felt off, or a sense of being unwelcome without a clear cause. At the town hall, those experiences were articulated.

One of the clearest accounts came from a woman who has lived in Allenhurst for ten years. When she first moved to town, neighbors did not realize she was Jewish and, she said, she encountered no issues. Once her Jewish identity became known, her experience changed. She described being asked where her horns were, facing assumptions that large numbers of people would live in her home, and being refused business outright by residents who told her they “don’t do business with Jews.” She also noted she had not experienced anti-Semitism before moving to Allenhurst.

Political Context and Public Scrutiny

These accounts did not emerge in a vacuum.

In May 2024, Frieda Adjmi, a Syrian Jewish resident and longtime Planning Board member, became Allenhurst’s first female mayor. Her election was followed almost immediately by an investigation into alleged voter irregularities, centered on a sharp increase in registrations. Critics suggested members of the Syrian Jewish community had improperly registered at seasonal homes.

The Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office ultimately closed the investigation without charges or findings of wrongdoing. However, the scrutiny and the tone of its coverage left a lasting impression on many residents, who saw it as part of a broader pattern where Jewish civic participation was treated with suspicion.

The Graffiti Incident

Weeks later, in June 2024, a local grocery store transitioning to a kosher establishment was vandalized. Jewish stars were painted across the property, alongside the words “go home.”

The response raised further concern. Rather than preserving the scene for investigation, the public works department removed the graffiti before evidence could be fully examined. Although Mayor Adjmi directed that the incident be referred to the bias crime unit, she said she never received confirmation that such a referral occurred. The incident was not covered in the press.

By the time of the March town hall meeting, these and other episodes had escalated into Jewish residents feeling an increasing sense of unease.

As the meeting progressed, tensions in the room rose. Speakers who shared experiences of anti-Semitism were at times interrupted or dismissed. When Mayor Adjmi rose to close the evening, she addressed not only the incidents themselves but the reaction to them. She said that dismissing or mocking someone’s account of discrimination is itself a form of harm.

She then shared her own history.

Since the 1990s, Mayor Adjimi has experienced anti-Semitism in Allenhurst. As a young woman, she found her beach club locker repeatedly filled with garbage, with the phrase “Syrian Free in ’93” written inside. She recalled being advised not to confront the behavior, but to accept that some residents were resistant to change.

Long-Term Engagement

Instead, she became more involved in the community – raising funds for local services, leading projects, and working to build shared spaces. In the early 2000s, she helped create a public playground intended to bring children of different backgrounds together. More recently, she led the development of pickleball courts, despite opposition from residents concerned about the courts attracting outsiders.

On the first day of Passover, those courts were vandalized.

No single incident defines a town. Each can be explained, disputed, or minimized on its own. But taken together – the testimonies, the graffiti, the vandalism, the patterns of opposition described by residents – a broader picture begins to emerge.

The Broader Question

The central issue is not only whether anti-Semitic acts have occurred. It is whether they are being taken seriously when they do.

When incidents are not fully investigated, when public accounts are dismissed, and when patterns are treated as isolated disputes, the result is not neutrality, it causes erosion of trust. For those experiencing it, the message is not ambiguous.

Mayor Adjmi’s Closing Message

Mayor Adjmi ended the evening not with accusation, but with intent.

“I ran because I wanted to heal the pain, heal the hate,” she said. Her closing message was simple: a hope for mutual recognition and respect in a community that is still struggling to define both.

That may be the real test facing towns like Allenhurst. Not whether conflict exists, it always will, but whether a community is willing to confront uncomfortable patterns honestly, or allow them to remain just below the surface, where they are easier to dismiss, and are harder to resolve.

Ask Jido – May 2026

Dear Jido,

Lately, I’ve been struggling with something I don’t quite know how to name. On the surface, my life is fine – I go to shul, work, see friends, make plans – but underneath it all, I feel this constant sense of guilt. There’s so much happening in Israel and in the broader Jewish world, and it feels wrong to just… carry on. I’ll catch myself laughing at dinner or enjoying a normal day, and then immediately feel like I’m being insensitive or disconnected. Part of me thinks I should be doing more, feeling more, being more affected – but I don’t even know what that’s supposed to look like.

At the same time, I’m exhausted by this feeling. I don’t want to live in a constant state of heaviness or obligation, but I also don’t want to become numb or indifferent. Is it okay to live my life fully when things aren’t okay? How do I find a balance between staying connected and not losing myself to it?

Sincerely,
Torn Between

Dear Torn Between,

I’m not a licensed Life Coach so I can’t officially advise you what to do. I can only tell you what I do because I feel exactly the same way.

First of all, you do need to keep in touch. As I recommended in this column shortly after October 7th, try the website DailyAlert.org. It’s compiled by the Jerusalem Center and it gives you the news highlights followed by world opinions. It’s a ten-minute read and then you’re finished with the news for the day.

Secondly, when you’re in shul, do your part by praying to Hashem for peace for the Jewish people. We conclude our prayers – hamevarech et amo Yisrael b’shalom, Amen. If you can follow up with real tears, it’s guaranteed to bring results.

Thirdly, actually do something to help, such as sending money to the hesed organizations in Israel like Feed Israel, Hatzalah, or even Zaka. You’ll feel that you are being part of the solution. Or perhaps send emails to your senators and congressmen petitioning for protection of our communities and institutions.  My understanding is that they actually do read their emails.

As far as living life, we are commanded – ivdu et Hashem b’simha. Enjoy the weddings. Focus on family and business. Thank Hashem for all of the little (and big) things in life.

We have been fighting our enemies, not for 80 years, but for over 3,500 years.  We are still here. Most of them are not. Know that Hashem is in charge, and as Rabbi Avigdor Miller, zt”l, would say – He created this world for pleasure.

Be informed. Be proactive. Be happy.  Jido

Riddles – April 2026

RIDDLE: Mixed Fruit

Submitted by:  Tammy K.

There are 3 boxes: one with only apples, one with only oranges, and one with both. All labels are wrong. You can pick one fruit from one box. How do you label all boxes correctly?

Last Month’s Riddle: Mis-Coinception

Two U.S. coins add up to 30 cents. If one of them is not a nickel, what are the two coins?

Solution: A nickel (5 cents), and a quarter (25 cents). This question makes you believe that neither coin is a nickel, which isn’t the case.

Solved by: Efraim Ben-Haim, Sol Borger, The Blum Family, Max Anteby, Benjamin Dana, Danny Esses, Murray Dana, Family Zimmerman, H. Soleimani, and the Big Cheese.

JUNIOR RIDDLE:   A Numbers Game

Submitted by:  Robert  C.

How many times can you subtract 5 from 25?

Last Month’s Junior Riddle: Time Twist

What day follows the day before yesterday if two days from now will be Sunday?

Solution: Thursday. “Two days from now will be Sunday,” so today is Friday. The “day that follows the day before yesterday” is just yesterday, which would be Thursday.

Solved by: Morris Kabani, Big Mike, Sol Borger, The Blums, Vicky Salame, Dassi Zimmerman, Haim Soleimani, Danny Esses, and The Shmulster.

The Lighter Side – April 2026

The Forgotten Car Keys

As Moishe left a board meeting at shul, he desperately gave himself a personal TSA pat down. He was looking for his keys. They were not in his pockets. A quick search in the meeting room revealed nothing. Suddenly he realized that he must have left them in the car. Frantically, he headed for the parking lot.

Moishe’s wife, Miriam, had scolded him many times for leaving the keys in the car. Moishe’s theory is that the keeping them in the car is the best place not to lose them. Miriam’s theory is that the car will be stolen. As Moishe burst through the doors of the shul, he came to a terrifying conclusion: Miriam’s theory was right. The parking lot was empty. He immediately called the police. He gave them his location, confessing that he had left the keys in the car and that it had been stolen.

Then Moishe made the most difficult call of all. “Honey,” he stammered, “I left my keys in the car, and it has been stolen.”

There was a period of silence. Moishe thought the call had been dropped, but then he heard Miriam’s voice. “Moishe!” she exclaimed, “I dropped you off!”

Now it was his time to be silent. Embarrassed, he said, “Well, could you please come and get me.”

Miriam retorted, “I will, as soon as I convince this policeman I have not stolen your car!”

Martin H.

The Lesson

Little Ernie is doing his homework one evening and has a problem.

“Dad,” he says, “what is the difference between anger and exasperation?”

“Well, son,” says his father, “I will give you a practical demonstration.”

His dad then goes to the phone and dials a random number.

“Hello,” comes a voice at the other end.
“Hello,” says Ernie’s father. “Is Melvin there?”
“There is no one called Melvin here!” comes the reply. “Why don’t you learn to look up numbers before you dial them?”

“You see?” says Ernie’s father. “That man was not at all happy with our call. But watch this!”
He then dials the same number again, and says, “Hello, is Melvin there?”
“Now look here!” comes the angry reply. “I told you there is no Melvin here! You have got a lot of nerve calling again!” And then he slams down the receiver.

“Did you hear that?” asks Ernie’s father. “That was anger. Now, I will show you what exasperation is!”

He picks up the phone and dials the same number again, and when a violent voice shouts, “HELLO!”

Ernie’s father says, “Hello! This is Melvin. Have there been any calls for me?”

Marvin S.

The Marriage Seminar

Rabbi Applebaum thought it would be a great idea to hold a marriage seminar at his congregation. And sure enough, many of the couples showed up. The therapist was focusing on communication and David and Lisa were listening as the therapist declared: “It is essential that husbands and wives know the things that are important to each other.”

He addressed the men: “For instance, gentlemen, can you name your wife’s favorite flower?”

David leaned over, touched Lisa’s arm gently and whispered, “Pillsbury All-Purpose, isn’t it?”

Karen B.

The Police Stop

A police officer stops Yankel for speeding and reckless driving and asks him very nicely to see his license.

Yankel replied in a huff, “I wish you guys could get your act together. Just yesterday you take away my license and now today you expect me to show it to you!”

Leon  P.

Advice from Moses

A burglar broke into a house one night. He shone his flashlight around, looking for valuables, and when he picked up an expensive watch to place in his sack, a strange, disembodied voice echoed from the dark, saying, “Heaven is watching you.”

He nearly jumped out of his skin, clicked his flashlight off and froze. When he heard nothing more after a bit, he shook his head, promised himself a vacation after the next big score. Then he clicked the light back on and began searching for more valuables. Just as he pulled the stereo out so he could disconnect the wires, clear as a bell he heard, “Heaven is watching you.”

Totally rattled, he shone his light around frantically, looking for the source of the voice. Finally, in the corner of the room, his flashlight beam came to rest on a small, parrot. “Did you say that?” he hissed at the parrot.

“Yes,” the parrot confessed, then squawked, “I’m just trying to warn you.”

The burglar relaxed. “Warn me, huh? Who do you think you are, anyway?”

“Moses,” replied the bird.

“Moses!” the burglar laughed. “What kind of people would name a parrot ‘Moses’?”

The little bird promptly answered, “The same kind of people who would name a Rottweiler ‘Heaven’!”

Sarah G.

Fishing Tip

An old man walked out onto a frozen lake on a bitter cold winter day. He drilled a hole in the ice, sat on his bucket, put his fishing line in the water and eagerly waited for a fish to bite.

He was there for almost five hours without even a nibble when a young boy walked out, drilled a hole in the ice and sat on his bucket not far from the old man. It only took about one minute and BAM! A huge fish bit his hook and the boy pulled in the fish.

The old man couldn’t believe it and figured it was just luck. Yet, the boy put his fish line in again and within just two minutes he pulled in another huge fish!

This went on and on until finally the old man couldn’t stand it any longer. He hadn’t caught a fish all day. He went to the boy and said, “Boy, I’ve been here nearly all day without even a nibble. You have been here only a few minutes and have caught TEN huge fish! How do you do it?”

The boy said, “Oo af o rep ra rums rm.”

“What?” asked the old man.

Again the boy said, “Oo af o rep ra rums rm.”

Freezing and impatient the old man yelled, “Look, I can’t understand a word you are saying!”

So, the boy took off his gloves, spit a clump of stuff into his hands and said, “You have to keep the worms warm!”

Joel K.

Building Dreams Together – The Open Palm vs. The Closed Fist

Jack Gindi

I recently read a story about renowned physicist Richard Feynman as a young boy, walking with his father and learning about the world around him. Other children could proudly name the birds they saw. They had memorized them perfectly. But his father asked a different question: “What does it do? How does it move? What makes it different?”

He wasn’t teaching his son to label the world. He was teaching him to observe it. To stay curious. To look longer than everyone else.

Feynman later said the easiest person to fool is yourself.

That line stays with me.

Because I’ve seen how easily we fool ourselves, not with ignorance, but with certainty.

An Open Palm or a Closed Fist

Some people move through life with an open palm. Others move through it with a closed fist.

An open palm is willing to learn. A closed fist fights to be right.

Now here’s something important: I live with certainty. I always have.

When I entered the real estate brokerage business, I was certain of one thing. I would become a top producer. I didn’t know how. I had no connections, no playbook, no roadmap. But I was certain of the destination.

That certainty didn’t close my hand. It opened it.

Because I didn’t know how, I had to watch. I had to ask questions. I studied the best. I followed leads. I failed. I adjusted.

My certainty was about where I was going. My openness was about how I would get there.

There’s a difference.

A closed fist says, “I already know.”

An open palm says, “Teach me.”

When Certainty Turns into Fear

We see this posture in the smallest moments. A disagreement at the dinner table. Feedback at work. A spouse pointing something out. A child asking a hard question.

Something challenges what we believe, and we feel it, that tightening. We defend. We explain. We protect our position.

That tightening can feel like strength.

But often, it’s fear.

Fear of being wrong. Fear of losing control. Fear of discovering we still have more to learn.

The most dangerous certainty isn’t believing you’re right. It’s believing you no longer need to grow.

You cannot receive anything new with a clenched hand. Not wisdom. Not correction. Not even deeper connection.

I learned this the long way.

There were seasons in my life when I believed standing firm meant refusing to question myself. I thought strength meant holding my ground at all costs. Over time, I discovered something humbling: when my hand was closed, nothing new could enter.

Wisdom does not force its way in.

It waits for space.

Naming Isn’t the Same as Seeing

We label situations quickly: “That’s just how I am.” “That’s the problem.” “That’s the answer.”

Once we’ve named it, we believe we’ve mastered it.

But naming isn’t seeing.

Seeing requires humility, the willingness to look again.

And humility is not weakness. It is strength under control.

Our children are watching this more than we realize. They don’t learn humility from lectures. They learn it by watching how we respond when we’re corrected.

Do we listen? Do we reconsider? Do we admit when we’re wrong? Or do we tighten our grip?

Confidence without curiosity becomes arrogance. Conviction without openness becomes blindness.

The Strongest Posture

The strongest posture I’ve found in life is this:

Be certain about your direction.
Stay open about your method.

Be certain about your values.
Be open about how you apply them.

Be certain about who you are becoming.
Be open about what you still need to learn.

Before you leave this thought tonight, ask yourself:

Where in my life am I certain about the outcome but closed to learning the path?
When was the last time I truly changed my mind?
What belief might I be holding too tightly?

Growth does not require abandoning conviction. It requires loosening our grip on how things must unfold.

Wisdom is not something we conquer. It is something we receive. And it can only enter an open hand. Onwards together – with love and gratitude.

From the Files of the Bet Din – Right of First Refusal?

The Case

Charles put his private home on the market for sale. Hymie, his next-door neighbor, was interested in the property and offered to match any price Charles received from the outside. By word of mouth, Charles found Ralph, a customer who was willing to pay 2.7 million dollars upfront for the property and go to closing within two weeks. Charles contacted Hymie and notified him of Ralph’s offer.  Hymie agreed to match the purchase price. However, he requested a mortgage contingency contract with a thirty-day window to obtain a loan from the bank. Hymie reassured Charles that he was in good standing with the bank and was probably eligible to receive a loan, but Charles rejected Hymie’s offer in favor of Ralph’s immediate cash payment. Charles signed with Ralph and accepted a deposit for the sale.

Hymie was disheartened by the refusal of his long-time friend and neighbor, and he reached out to other community members to intervene on his behalf. As a result, Charles had a change of heart and verbally agreed to sell his property to Hymie with a mortgage contingency. Charles contacted Ralph and notified him of the latest developments and unilaterally sent him back his deposit.

At first, Ralph refused to hear any of the details of the story and was prepared to enforce his contract. Hymie got involved then, contacting Ralph and claiming that as a next-door neighbor he had a right of first refusal of the property. He further insisted that by Torah law Ralph was required to walk away from the deal. At this point, Ralph did not want the argument to escalate and suggested the matter be resolved in Bet Din. The three signed on for the customary binding of arbitration and presented their cases to our Bet Din.

Who is entitled to purchase the property, Hymie or Ralph?  How should the Bet Din rule and why?

Torah Law

According to the ruling of the Shulhan Aruch, a next-door neighbor maintains the right of first refusal in the event the adjoining property to his home is up for sale. The rationale for this ruling is based on a verse in the Torah that requires one at times to go beyond the letter of the law for the sake of his brother. Since a next-door neighbor stands to gain significantly from purchasing the adjoining property, it is incumbent on an outside buyer to allow the neighbor the right of first refusal. In the event the outside buyer purchases the property without legal confirmation from the neighbor, a Bet Din will elect to evict him from the property, and allow the neighbor to make the acquisition.

The above ruling is subject to numerous provisions and restrictions and a competent halachic authority must be consulted before awarding a neighbor the right to purchase the adjoining property to his home. In instances in which the seller is posed with a disadvantage if he sells to the neighbor and not the outside buyer the law of “right of first refusal” is not applicable. Numerous scenarios are discussed by the great Sages of the Talmud that illustrate common disadvantages, including a neighbor who is willing to match the purchase price of an outside buyer, but requests a mortgage contingency. Since the outside buyer is ready to close immediately the neighbor is denied the right to purchase. Albeit, if the seller is willing to wait for his neighbor to come up with the funds needed, the outside buyer is required to step away from the deal in the meantime.

Leading halachic authorities debate whether the above ruling is applicable in instances in which at first the seller denied the neighbor on account of his mortgage contingency request, only to later change his mind in favor.  Early halachic sources rule that once the seller legally commits to an outside buyer willing to close immediately, he may no longer reverse his decision and sell the property to his neighbor. Since the outside buyer established a legal holding on the property, he is entitled to complete his purchase without moral concern for the neighbor. Although another reputable halachic opinion rules to the contrary, this latter opinion is nevertheless overruled.

 As aforementioned, an outside buyer is removed from the property if he halachically violated the rights of the adjoining neighbor. Nevertheless, in instances in which there is a halachic debate whether a neighbor is presently entitled to evict the outside buyer, the neighbor is rejected. Since the outside buyer is already in possession of the property, the neighbor may not claim rights of ownership in case of a halachic debate of the Sages. Rather the outside buyer in possession of the property can keep his purchase relying on the opinion that supports his position.

Endnotes: Baba Metziah 108b, Shulhan Aruch Hoshen Mishpat 175, Sema 175:7, Teshuvat HaRashba 2:85, Pithei Teshuva 175:11, Divrei Shalom H.M. 8, pg.13, Shulhan Aruch Hoshen Mishpat 175:45.

VERDICT: Too Late

Our Bet Din ruled in favor of Ralph and denied Hymie the neighbor the right to purchase Charles’s home. As mentioned in Torah law, Ralph purchased the home only after Charles legally rejected Hymie because he was unable to close immediately. Since Charles was not required to wait for Hymie to get an approval for a mortgage, and furthermore there was no guarantee the bank would extend him a loan, the law of “right of first refusal” is not applicable. Hence, although Charles later changed his mind, it was simply too late. Once Hymie lost the legal right to purchase, it cannot be reinstated. Hence, Charles is required to accept the return of the deposit and close the sale of his property with Ralph. As mentioned in Torah law, leading halachic authorities rule that although Charles is now willing to sell the property to Hymie his neighbor, at this point, Ralph has no further moral obligation to Hymie and is entitled to his acquisition.

In Loving Memory of Vera Bat Carol, A”H

YOU BE THE JUDGE

The Rightful Heir

Jack wrote a handwritten last will and testament back in 2007. Upon his passing in 2019, the will was found with Jack’s papers in his safety deposit box.  The will was not prepared by a lawyer nor was it notarized or signed by witnesses. Jack simply affixed his signature to the bottom of a briefly written statement. In the will, Jack offered to gift his private home to the child that provides full-time room and board his son Joey, a special child. In 2007 when Jack wrote the will his only daughter was not yet married. In 2019, prior to Jack’s passing, his daughter, then married, took Joey into her home for nearly six months before sending him off to a facility that provides for all of Joey’s needs. Jack’s daughter and son-in-law presented the handwritten document to our Bet Din claiming that their father legally gifted them his home since they provided room and board for Joey. Jack’s two sons acknowledged that they were aware of the document their father wrote before their sister provided room and board for their brother Joey, but they were nevertheless unwilling to transfer the property over to their sister.  The two brothers defended that it was not their father’s intent to gift his daughter the home for a mere six months of room and board. They explained that back in 2007 the circumstances were different and there was a real concern for Joey’s welfare.

Who should inherit the father’s home? How should the Bet Din rule and why?