Home Blog Page 12

Anna Augusta: Where Couture Becomes Personal

Jenna Ashkenazie

In a world where fashion often moves fast, Anna Augusta has built something rare – an experience that feels truly personal. For over a decade in New York, she has been creating gowns with care, precision, and a deep understanding of each woman – where every dress becomes a true reflection of the client.

Born in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, Anna is inspired by the rich history of the ancient Silk Road – a place where cultures, styles, and traditions came together. This influence can be felt in her designs, which combines timeless beauty with a modern, elegant touch. Her journey to New York began in an international environment, arriving in the United States as the spouse of a representative at her country’s mission to the United Nations. Being surrounded by different cultures and perspectives helped shape her unique approach to design – one that feels both global and deeply personal. 

One-on-One Personal and Expert Guidance

What makes Anna Augusta truly special is the experience she offers her clients. In today’s world, it is very rare to work directly with a couture-level designer. At Anna Augusta, every bride is personally guided through the entire process, with Anna acting not only as a designer, but also as a trusted fashion consultant. Each gown begins with a thoughtful conversation – not just about measurements, but about personality, style, lifestyle, and the overall vision for the wedding day.

From there, the bride becomes part of the creative journey, actively participating in shaping her gown. Together, they refine every detail, ensuring the final design feels authentic, personal, and perfectly aligned with the woman who will wear it. This personal attention makes all the difference. Every gown becomes more than just a dress – it becomes a statement of the woman wearing it. The result is something truly unique, created with care, intention, and artistry. For Anna’s clients, this is not just a service – it is a seamless, stress-free experience and a truly memorable journey. 

This approach is what has made Anna Augusta so loved and trusted among her clients. Her gowns stand out not because they follow trends, but because they reflect real women and real stories.

Future Expansion

With the opening of BUY GOWN, Anna Augusta made her designs more accessible for women who need a beautiful dress right away. Clients can choose from a curated collection of wedding and evening gowns available for purchase or rent – while still enjoying high quality and thoughtful design. As demand continues to grow, Anna is preparing to expand into New Jersey, making it easier for clients across New Jersey and Pennsylvania to experience her work. At the same time, there is an influx of retail stores that are showing interest in carrying Anna Augusta designs, recognizing the uniqueness and craftsmanship behind each piece.

 Looking ahead, Anna Augusta plans to grow into a leading designer and manufacturer of modest and plus-size gowns, bringing elegance and attention to detail to a wider range of women. She is also expanding her evening wear collections, offering both one-of-a-kind couture pieces and ready-to-wear designs – so her clients can always feel stylish and confident.  In a time when everything moves at a rapid pace, Anna Augusta offers something truly special: personal attention, true craftsmanship, a seamless, stress-free experience, and gowns that are not just worn – but deeply felt.

A Pattern That Can No Longer Be Ignored

On March 17, Allenhurst held its monthly town hall meeting. What unfolded was not routine civic discussion, but something more revealing: a series of firsthand accounts from Jewish residents describing experiences of exclusion, hostility, and discrimination that, until now, had largely gone unspoken.

For years, many in the community have described carrying quieter versions of these moments – interactions that felt off, or a sense of being unwelcome without a clear cause. At the town hall, those experiences were articulated.

One of the clearest accounts came from a woman who has lived in Allenhurst for ten years. When she first moved to town, neighbors did not realize she was Jewish and, she said, she encountered no issues. Once her Jewish identity became known, her experience changed. She described being asked where her horns were, facing assumptions that large numbers of people would live in her home, and being refused business outright by residents who told her they “don’t do business with Jews.” She also noted she had not experienced anti-Semitism before moving to Allenhurst.

Political Context and Public Scrutiny

These accounts did not emerge in a vacuum.

In May 2024, Frieda Adjmi, a Syrian Jewish resident and longtime Planning Board member, became Allenhurst’s first female mayor. Her election was followed almost immediately by an investigation into alleged voter irregularities, centered on a sharp increase in registrations. Critics suggested members of the Syrian Jewish community had improperly registered at seasonal homes.

The Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office ultimately closed the investigation without charges or findings of wrongdoing. However, the scrutiny and the tone of its coverage left a lasting impression on many residents, who saw it as part of a broader pattern where Jewish civic participation was treated with suspicion.

The Graffiti Incident

Weeks later, in June 2024, a local grocery store transitioning to a kosher establishment was vandalized. Jewish stars were painted across the property, alongside the words “go home.”

The response raised further concern. Rather than preserving the scene for investigation, the public works department removed the graffiti before evidence could be fully examined. Although Mayor Adjmi directed that the incident be referred to the bias crime unit, she said she never received confirmation that such a referral occurred. The incident was not covered in the press.

By the time of the March town hall meeting, these and other episodes had escalated into Jewish residents feeling an increasing sense of unease.

As the meeting progressed, tensions in the room rose. Speakers who shared experiences of anti-Semitism were at times interrupted or dismissed. When Mayor Adjmi rose to close the evening, she addressed not only the incidents themselves but the reaction to them. She said that dismissing or mocking someone’s account of discrimination is itself a form of harm.

She then shared her own history.

Since the 1990s, Mayor Adjimi has experienced anti-Semitism in Allenhurst. As a young woman, she found her beach club locker repeatedly filled with garbage, with the phrase “Syrian Free in ’93” written inside. She recalled being advised not to confront the behavior, but to accept that some residents were resistant to change.

Long-Term Engagement

Instead, she became more involved in the community – raising funds for local services, leading projects, and working to build shared spaces. In the early 2000s, she helped create a public playground intended to bring children of different backgrounds together. More recently, she led the development of pickleball courts, despite opposition from residents concerned about the courts attracting outsiders.

On the first day of Passover, those courts were vandalized.

No single incident defines a town. Each can be explained, disputed, or minimized on its own. But taken together – the testimonies, the graffiti, the vandalism, the patterns of opposition described by residents – a broader picture begins to emerge.

The Broader Question

The central issue is not only whether anti-Semitic acts have occurred. It is whether they are being taken seriously when they do.

When incidents are not fully investigated, when public accounts are dismissed, and when patterns are treated as isolated disputes, the result is not neutrality, it causes erosion of trust. For those experiencing it, the message is not ambiguous.

Mayor Adjmi’s Closing Message

Mayor Adjmi ended the evening not with accusation, but with intent.

“I ran because I wanted to heal the pain, heal the hate,” she said. Her closing message was simple: a hope for mutual recognition and respect in a community that is still struggling to define both.

That may be the real test facing towns like Allenhurst. Not whether conflict exists, it always will, but whether a community is willing to confront uncomfortable patterns honestly, or allow them to remain just below the surface, where they are easier to dismiss, and are harder to resolve.

Ask Jido – May 2026

Dear Jido,

Lately, I’ve been struggling with something I don’t quite know how to name. On the surface, my life is fine – I go to shul, work, see friends, make plans – but underneath it all, I feel this constant sense of guilt. There’s so much happening in Israel and in the broader Jewish world, and it feels wrong to just… carry on. I’ll catch myself laughing at dinner or enjoying a normal day, and then immediately feel like I’m being insensitive or disconnected. Part of me thinks I should be doing more, feeling more, being more affected – but I don’t even know what that’s supposed to look like.

At the same time, I’m exhausted by this feeling. I don’t want to live in a constant state of heaviness or obligation, but I also don’t want to become numb or indifferent. Is it okay to live my life fully when things aren’t okay? How do I find a balance between staying connected and not losing myself to it?

Sincerely,
Torn Between

Dear Torn Between,

I’m not a licensed Life Coach so I can’t officially advise you what to do. I can only tell you what I do because I feel exactly the same way.

First of all, you do need to keep in touch. As I recommended in this column shortly after October 7th, try the website DailyAlert.org. It’s compiled by the Jerusalem Center and it gives you the news highlights followed by world opinions. It’s a ten-minute read and then you’re finished with the news for the day.

Secondly, when you’re in shul, do your part by praying to Hashem for peace for the Jewish people. We conclude our prayers – hamevarech et amo Yisrael b’shalom, Amen. If you can follow up with real tears, it’s guaranteed to bring results.

Thirdly, actually do something to help, such as sending money to the hesed organizations in Israel like Feed Israel, Hatzalah, or even Zaka. You’ll feel that you are being part of the solution. Or perhaps send emails to your senators and congressmen petitioning for protection of our communities and institutions.  My understanding is that they actually do read their emails.

As far as living life, we are commanded – ivdu et Hashem b’simha. Enjoy the weddings. Focus on family and business. Thank Hashem for all of the little (and big) things in life.

We have been fighting our enemies, not for 80 years, but for over 3,500 years.  We are still here. Most of them are not. Know that Hashem is in charge, and as Rabbi Avigdor Miller, zt”l, would say – He created this world for pleasure.

Be informed. Be proactive. Be happy.  Jido

Riddles – April 2026

RIDDLE: Mixed Fruit

Submitted by:  Tammy K.

There are 3 boxes: one with only apples, one with only oranges, and one with both. All labels are wrong. You can pick one fruit from one box. How do you label all boxes correctly?

Last Month’s Riddle: Mis-Coinception

Two U.S. coins add up to 30 cents. If one of them is not a nickel, what are the two coins?

Solution: A nickel (5 cents), and a quarter (25 cents). This question makes you believe that neither coin is a nickel, which isn’t the case.

Solved by: Efraim Ben-Haim, Sol Borger, The Blum Family, Max Anteby, Benjamin Dana, Danny Esses, Murray Dana, Family Zimmerman, H. Soleimani, and the Big Cheese.

JUNIOR RIDDLE:   A Numbers Game

Submitted by:  Robert  C.

How many times can you subtract 5 from 25?

Last Month’s Junior Riddle: Time Twist

What day follows the day before yesterday if two days from now will be Sunday?

Solution: Thursday. “Two days from now will be Sunday,” so today is Friday. The “day that follows the day before yesterday” is just yesterday, which would be Thursday.

Solved by: Morris Kabani, Big Mike, Sol Borger, The Blums, Vicky Salame, Dassi Zimmerman, Haim Soleimani, Danny Esses, and The Shmulster.

The Lighter Side – April 2026

The Forgotten Car Keys

As Moishe left a board meeting at shul, he desperately gave himself a personal TSA pat down. He was looking for his keys. They were not in his pockets. A quick search in the meeting room revealed nothing. Suddenly he realized that he must have left them in the car. Frantically, he headed for the parking lot.

Moishe’s wife, Miriam, had scolded him many times for leaving the keys in the car. Moishe’s theory is that the keeping them in the car is the best place not to lose them. Miriam’s theory is that the car will be stolen. As Moishe burst through the doors of the shul, he came to a terrifying conclusion: Miriam’s theory was right. The parking lot was empty. He immediately called the police. He gave them his location, confessing that he had left the keys in the car and that it had been stolen.

Then Moishe made the most difficult call of all. “Honey,” he stammered, “I left my keys in the car, and it has been stolen.”

There was a period of silence. Moishe thought the call had been dropped, but then he heard Miriam’s voice. “Moishe!” she exclaimed, “I dropped you off!”

Now it was his time to be silent. Embarrassed, he said, “Well, could you please come and get me.”

Miriam retorted, “I will, as soon as I convince this policeman I have not stolen your car!”

Martin H.

The Lesson

Little Ernie is doing his homework one evening and has a problem.

“Dad,” he says, “what is the difference between anger and exasperation?”

“Well, son,” says his father, “I will give you a practical demonstration.”

His dad then goes to the phone and dials a random number.

“Hello,” comes a voice at the other end.
“Hello,” says Ernie’s father. “Is Melvin there?”
“There is no one called Melvin here!” comes the reply. “Why don’t you learn to look up numbers before you dial them?”

“You see?” says Ernie’s father. “That man was not at all happy with our call. But watch this!”
He then dials the same number again, and says, “Hello, is Melvin there?”
“Now look here!” comes the angry reply. “I told you there is no Melvin here! You have got a lot of nerve calling again!” And then he slams down the receiver.

“Did you hear that?” asks Ernie’s father. “That was anger. Now, I will show you what exasperation is!”

He picks up the phone and dials the same number again, and when a violent voice shouts, “HELLO!”

Ernie’s father says, “Hello! This is Melvin. Have there been any calls for me?”

Marvin S.

The Marriage Seminar

Rabbi Applebaum thought it would be a great idea to hold a marriage seminar at his congregation. And sure enough, many of the couples showed up. The therapist was focusing on communication and David and Lisa were listening as the therapist declared: “It is essential that husbands and wives know the things that are important to each other.”

He addressed the men: “For instance, gentlemen, can you name your wife’s favorite flower?”

David leaned over, touched Lisa’s arm gently and whispered, “Pillsbury All-Purpose, isn’t it?”

Karen B.

The Police Stop

A police officer stops Yankel for speeding and reckless driving and asks him very nicely to see his license.

Yankel replied in a huff, “I wish you guys could get your act together. Just yesterday you take away my license and now today you expect me to show it to you!”

Leon  P.

Advice from Moses

A burglar broke into a house one night. He shone his flashlight around, looking for valuables, and when he picked up an expensive watch to place in his sack, a strange, disembodied voice echoed from the dark, saying, “Heaven is watching you.”

He nearly jumped out of his skin, clicked his flashlight off and froze. When he heard nothing more after a bit, he shook his head, promised himself a vacation after the next big score. Then he clicked the light back on and began searching for more valuables. Just as he pulled the stereo out so he could disconnect the wires, clear as a bell he heard, “Heaven is watching you.”

Totally rattled, he shone his light around frantically, looking for the source of the voice. Finally, in the corner of the room, his flashlight beam came to rest on a small, parrot. “Did you say that?” he hissed at the parrot.

“Yes,” the parrot confessed, then squawked, “I’m just trying to warn you.”

The burglar relaxed. “Warn me, huh? Who do you think you are, anyway?”

“Moses,” replied the bird.

“Moses!” the burglar laughed. “What kind of people would name a parrot ‘Moses’?”

The little bird promptly answered, “The same kind of people who would name a Rottweiler ‘Heaven’!”

Sarah G.

Fishing Tip

An old man walked out onto a frozen lake on a bitter cold winter day. He drilled a hole in the ice, sat on his bucket, put his fishing line in the water and eagerly waited for a fish to bite.

He was there for almost five hours without even a nibble when a young boy walked out, drilled a hole in the ice and sat on his bucket not far from the old man. It only took about one minute and BAM! A huge fish bit his hook and the boy pulled in the fish.

The old man couldn’t believe it and figured it was just luck. Yet, the boy put his fish line in again and within just two minutes he pulled in another huge fish!

This went on and on until finally the old man couldn’t stand it any longer. He hadn’t caught a fish all day. He went to the boy and said, “Boy, I’ve been here nearly all day without even a nibble. You have been here only a few minutes and have caught TEN huge fish! How do you do it?”

The boy said, “Oo af o rep ra rums rm.”

“What?” asked the old man.

Again the boy said, “Oo af o rep ra rums rm.”

Freezing and impatient the old man yelled, “Look, I can’t understand a word you are saying!”

So, the boy took off his gloves, spit a clump of stuff into his hands and said, “You have to keep the worms warm!”

Joel K.

Ask Jido – April 2026

Dear Jido,

As our youngest child was growing up, we noticed that he had very slow development in certain areas.  When he turned two and was still not babbling or talking, our pediatrician said not to worry – he was only a late talker.  But as he got older, we started noticing other troubling behaviors. We finally took him to a specialist who diagnosed him with autism.

I understand that there are four different schools in our community that treat autism but I was told by people not to send him to two of them because otherwise there would be a “stigma” and he would not be accepted later into the mainstream yeshivas. They also said that the family would have a stigma that might affect shidduchim for his siblings.

Do you have any advice on how we should proceed?

Signed,

Mother with a Stigma

Dear Mother,

I’m trying to understand your question.  You have to do what is best for your child now. That is your obligation as a parent. Yes, there are varying degrees of interventions that can be effective in treating autism and he should get the benefit of the one most suited to his needs – even if it means going to a school associated with the most severe cases. Being concerned about what “might” happen down the road should not enter the equation. 

My understanding is that the sooner symptoms of autism are treated, the better the chances of your son’s complete recovery. Please don’t let friends and neighbors tell you how to help your child. Go to the experts who have been treating children like your son for many years and let them guide you regardless of what others might “think” about your son years from now.  Jido

Panama Will Never Be The Same Again!

Dirshu Led by Rabbi Eli Mansour and Rav Dovid Hofstedter Transform Panama

Chaim Gold

“The first time I visited your community in Panama was twenty-five years ago. At that time, I remember meeting the unforgettable Chief Rabbi of Panama Haham Sion Levy, zt”l. During our conversation he told me, ‘HaRav Eli, do you know what the acronym (in Hebrew) of Panama is? It stands for Po Nimtzah Mamon Harbeh!’ [Here there is a lot of money.]

“That’s what he said twenty-five years ago. However, I have no doubt that if your great Rabbi, Haham Sion would be here tonight, he would for sure change the acronym and say, ‘Panama tonight – Po Nimtza Mattan HaTorah!’”

That was the powerful opening of a seminal address delivered by Rav Eli Mansour, Rabbi of the Safra Synagogue, at the historic Dirshu Maamad Ahavat HaTorah recently held in in Panama.

Dirshu Spectacular Community Event

To understand the history of the Torah revolution that the Panama Jewish community is undergoing, one had to witness this Dirshu event! It was an event where more than 1,000 men, women, and children representing the entire cross-section of the community came to celebrate Torah learning and to pledge their commitment to sustain accountable limud haTorah.

Never in its history has the Panama Jewish community ever experienced an event for the sole purpose of promoting limud haTorah. As one community leader related, “When I told people about the upcoming Dirshu event, the first thing they asked me was, ‘How much money do you want from me?’ Indeed, most Rabbinic guests who come to Panama come to raise money, but I told them that in this case Dirshu and its Nasi, Rav Dovid Hofstedter, are NOT coming to raise money! They are coming to GIVE! They want nothing more from the community than to increase Torah, to try facilitating more shiurei Torah, to try raising the level of daily accountable Torah learning in our community.”

Twenty-Five Years Ago Versus Today

“Should I tell you a bit more about my first trip to Panama twenty-five years ago?” Rabbi Mansour asked. “I’ll tell you! Twenty-five years ago, I wasn’t speaking in this beautiful, large auditorium. It was a gathering in The Club. Many of you weren’t even born! Rav Sion told me, ‘Rabbi Eliyahu we have a crisis in Panama, we need hizuk in kedushat hamishpacha, in shemirat Shabbat, in kashrut!’

“And who did I address in that club twenty-five years ago?” Rabbi Mansour exclaimed, “There were no white shirts! There were no black jackets! No one was wearing a hat! There was no band playing Jewish music, no Yoreh Deah on the tables, no talmidei hahamim at the dais! Nothing like this!

“I gave a speech for men and women sitting together. We were trying to convince them that it is kedai to keep tahara, to eat kosher, that it is kedai to keep Shabbat. Who would have believed that one generation later we would already be coming here?! Who would have believed that now the discussion is Daf HaYomi, Amud HaYomi, Daf HaYomi B’Halacha, Mishnah Berurah, this learning, that learning, more iyun, less iyun… Now we are already dealing with different sheailot!!

“I know our tradition says that there is yeridat hadorot but I question this because here in Panama we are witnessing aliyat hadorot! We are witnessing what the Gemara says, ‘achsar dara’ – the generation is getting better!”

A Line of Demarcation and a Night of Highlights

In truth, the Dirshu Evening of Hizuk was a rally on behalf of limud haTorah and a demarcation line that perhaps will forever be a “before and after moment” regarding the renaissance of Torah in the Panama Jewish community.

Never before in the history of the community has everyone – all the community’s Rabbanim, Ashkenazim, Sephardim, yeshivish, baalebatim – come together to show their support and admiration for something like Dirshu, an organization whoseraisond’être is to enhance Torah opportunities in the community.

One highlight of the evening was the speech of the Nasi of Dirshu, Rav Dovid Hofstedter, whose remarks, personality, and life story made a profound impact on the community. Rabbi Hofstedter also took the opportunity while he was in Panama to visit numerous Torah institutions throughout the city and address many of them as well.

Another highlight was the emotional, enthusiastic, beautiful musical entertainment led by Naftali Kempe and accompanied by a large band and choir, all of whom came especially to Panama for the event.

The combination of drashot and divrei Torah for the heart and music for the soul, provided the more than one thousand members of the Panama community an all-encompassing spiritual experience that will remain with them for the rest of their lives.

One of the most heart-warming moments was the grand entrance of all the Rabbanim of the community culminating in more than twenty-five Rabbanim representing the entire spectrum of Panama Jewry taking their place at the dais. There could be no greater expression of the hashivut of what Dirshu is doing for the community than the presence of the entire Rabbinic leadership.

After the event, one prominent askan commented in amazement that the most powerful moment was when all the Rabbanim joined together to dance with ahdut and simha.

A Stellar Lineup

The evening began with welcoming remarks by Rabbi Gavriel Betesh, Rav of the Hebrew Academy of Panama, followed by addresses from four of the most prominent Rabbanim in the community, Rav David Perets, shlita, Rav Avraham Silvera, shlita, Rav Elazar Ben Hamu, shlita, and Rav Eliyahu Monobello, shlita.

An awe-filled silence settled on the room as Rabbi Eli Avraham, a prominent marbitz Torah who is at the forefront of many of Panama’s Torah activities, was asked to make a siyum on Masechtah Pesachim that is being completed by Dirshu’s Amud HaYomi program. After Rabbi Avraham completed the Kaddish the entire assemblage burst into spirited song led by Naftali Kempe. The emotion in the room was palpable as the feeling of being connected to the wider Torah world enveloped Panama’s Jewish community.

In an evening replete with highlights, the singular video messages recorded especially for the event by leading Gedolei Torah from Eretz Yisrael was particularly impactful. Special messages tailormade for the Panama community were delivered by HaGaon HaRav Moshe Hillel Hirsch, shlita, Rosh Yeshiva of the Slabodka Yeshiva, HaGaon HaRav Avraham Salim, shlita, Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshiva Me’or HaTorah, HaGaon HaRav Dovid Cohen, shlita, Rosh Yeshiva of the Chevron Yeshiva, and HaGaon HaRav Shlomo Yedidya Zafrani, shlita, Av Beis Din, Kesser Torah and Rosh Yeshivas Sifsei Chaim.

Their individualized words of hizuk contained timely messages for the community combined with a sense of joy, as each one of the Gedolim expressed their excitement over the fact that the Dirshu revolution is coming to Panama.

Strengthening Torah Learning

Rav Moshe Hillel expressed tremendous joy about the remarkable Torah strides made by the Panama community in recent and then he spoke about Dirshu, saying, “I have seen what Dirshu’s programs to strengthen the learning of Torah, whether it is Gemara or halacha, have done for the Jews of Eretz Yisrael and America. They have added so much to the spiritual lives of those who are part of Dirshu and who have profoundly upgraded their Torah learning. I am certain that joining Dirshu’s programs will likewise tremendously elevate the level of Torah learning in Panama.” 

Rabbi Gavriel Chizkiya, who leads Dirshu’s operations in Panama, related, “The community was very strongly moved by the fact that senior Gedolei Yisrael such as Rav Hirsch, Rav Salim, Rav Dovid Cohen, and Rav Zafrani sent special messages encouraging the Jews of Panama to join Dirshu’s programs and describing for us how they have seen the phenomenal impact that Dirshu made in many locales across the world!”

Rav Dovid Hofstedter

There is no doubt that one of the highlights of the evening was the powerful drasha given by Rav Dovid Hofstedter.

Rav Dovid began by recalling his last visit to Panama over thirty-five years ago.

“The reason I came then was not because of the wonderful weather or the other recreational opportunities that Panama has to offer. You’ll be surprised to hear this, but thirty-five years ago, the economic situation in the city of Toronto was such that several mosdot haTorah were in danger of closing their doors! Klal Yisrael is amazing! What does one do when faced with such a challenge? I was told that I should go to Panama because the wonderfully warm-hearted Jews in Panama would take care of us… and indeed, this wonderful community didn’t ask why Toronto was coming for support! Rather, they accepted us with open arms and did whatever they could to help us! And today? Look around. Wow! What a wonderful community! What a community with spiritual aspirations!”

Rabbi Hofstedter then went to deliver a dvar Torah that showed how a person having to come out of their comfort zone to go above and beyond. He explained that Mordehai HaYehudi had every reason in the world and every justification to bow down to Haman. It was permitted. It wasn’t idolatry. Nevertheless, the passuk tells us, “U’Mordehai lo yichreh v’lo yishtahave – and Mordehai refused to bend and refused to bow.”

Panama at a Crossroads

Rav Hofstedter continued, “There are times in life when a person or a community is faced with a challenge. There are times when there is every reason in the world not to try achieving a specific goal and many times it is possible that the reasons are even justified. Sometimes, however, when a difficult challenge presents itself, we, just like Mordechai, come to the realization that this is our purpose and if we don’t elevate and motivate ourselves to meet this challenge head-on, we may squander the opportunity forever.

“This wonderful community that has, bli ayin hara, grown so much, is at a crossroads. The foundation has been built. Now the people of this community are empowered to accept upon themselves and decide with an ironclad decision to elevate themselves and achieve an important goal! This city can become an ihr v’em b’Yisrael [a Jewish “mother-city,” a cultural center for the Jewish people] in Torah study! It can be a community that when people come to visit, they can say that this community, this unique community, has flourished to become full of talmidei hahamim from east to west and from north to south.”

The applause was deafening as the entire assemblage stood on their feet clapping. You could see the glint of the challenge in their eyes as they contemplated meeting that challenge head on.

Rav Hofstedter concluded his remarks with a fascinating story that emotionally drew the assemblage into his personal world.

A Young Girl’s Story

“We are now in the period between the Yamim Tovim of Purim and Pesah. I want to tell you a story about someone who had all the excuses in the world but instead rose to the occasion and merited in that zehut something eternal.

“Around one-hundred years ago this person, a young girl, lived in a tiny little village in Europe before the Holocaust. There was no Bet Yaakov school in her village, no day school, no summer camps, and no Bnot groups. There wasn’t even a minyan in town during the week. The hinuch she received was what she learned from her mother, her father, her grandmother, and her uncles. The town was so small that in order to have a minyan on Shabbos, they would have to bring in bahurim from a nearby town. In our world, we would say that she had no hinuch

“When the war broke out, she was all of sixteen years old. At that young age, she was taken to Auschwitz, and from there to a brutal slave labor camp called Allendorf. Then came Pesah, Pesah, 1945. She knew that it was simply impossible for a Jewish girl to eat hametz on Pesah. But not eating hametz meant starving. Nothing less. Still the hinuch she had received at home was so real, so sincere, so Gd-fearing, that she felt that, come what may, she would not eat bread on Pesah. There was a problem, though. If the Nazis saw that the prisoners didn’t take the bread, they would beat them to death, so she had to take the bread. What did she do? She took the bread and buried the pieces in the ground.

“Not long after that fateful Pesah, the last Pesah of the war, the allies began bombing Allendorf. The Nazis liquidated the camp, sending that girl with all the other prisoners on the infamous Death March. They marched for days and days. People were falling and dying all around. There was no food, no water… nothing!

“And then it happened! One day, the Nazis suddenly disappeared! The allies were almost there! That girl and her friends were a short distance from a farmhouse when she collapsed. She simply couldn’t carry on. Her friends, however, brought her to the farmhouse, gave her water and some food that revived her and brought her back to life.

“What enabled her to last on the Death March until that point even though so many others had died? Just before they were herded away to begin the Death March, she remembered the hidden bread and retrieved it. It was that bread, bread that she had not eaten on Pesah so that she could refrain from eating hametz. That bread saved her life, giving her sufficient nourishment to withstand the cruel march into Germany…! Until they were finally liberated.

Morai v’Rabbotai! That young girl was my mother, a”h! It is because she survived that I am here with you tonight! Because there was a young girl who had all the teirutzim, all the excuses in the world, but pushed herself above and beyond, to do what she felt was important in order to fulfill her purpose in the world!”

The History of Dirshu in Panama

Rabbi Gabriel Chizkiya, who leads Dirshu’s activities in Panama, described how Dirshu has grown in Panama, raising the spirituality of the community. Dirshu has been in Panama for more than a decade. It began with a group that learns the Daf Hayomi B’Halacha and more recently the Amud Hayomi. In the last few years, however, the community has grown exponentially. There is a very large yeshiva and there are also teachers of Torah who have come to the community and this has facilitated a tremendous spiritual growth and Torah learning. The younger generation, here in Panama, have also gone to learn in yeshiva in Eretz Yisrael and have later returned to the community after their marriage. These young people are coming with a background in Torah learning and are now being offered serious learning opportunities even as they are already involved in the business world.

Many baalebaim learn at the kollel in the morning or in the evening and they have avreihim as havrutot. Dirshu programs such as Amud Hayomi are perfect for them! The set schedule along with the built-in review and possibility of taking tests serve as even greater motivators. In addition, an Amud Yomi haburah has opened, where there are many havrutot learning at the same time and a rosh haburah who is available to answer questions.

“Now,” Rabbi Chizkiya continued, “in the aftermath of the event, I have been swamped with phone calls, messages and even people coming up to me in the street saying that they want to join a program. They came to the evening of Ahavat HaTorah and were so inspired! They don’t want to lose their enthusiasm! They want to grab the opportunity to incorporate more Torah into their life in a sustainable way.

“Another byproduct of the event,” Rabbi Chizkiya stressed, “was the very positive impact it made on the women of the community. Although many young men go to learn in yeshiva, most of the girls and women remain in Panama and don’t have any exposure to the Torah world as the boys do. One community member told me that the presence of prominent rabbanim and the opportunity to hear messages from gedolim, the inspiring music, and the fact that so many came to the event just to celebrate limud haTorah has strengthened observance and Judaism in many homes!”

The Price for Torah!

There was pin-drop silence as Rabbi Eli Mansour rose to deliver the keynote address of the evening. Rabbi Mansour elaborated on the miraculous way that Torah has endured throughout the Galut. He explained that we see how throughout the years, the only way Torah survives and thrives is when we pay a price for Torah. At the time of Purim, the Bnei Yisrael were threatened with death, but they were saved! Afterwards, Chazal teach us that the Bnei Yisrael accepted upon themselves the Torah with ahavah, with love as a result of the miracle of Purim, as a result of going from mitah l’haim, from the decree of death to life!

What ensued was most fertile periods of Torah. That was when the Talmud was written, the Mishnah, Gemara, etc.

“The bottom line,” Rabbi Mansour exclaimed, “is that every time there has been a renaissance of Torah it was only after the Jewish people paid a price! Now, in our generation,” he continued, “we are getting toward the end of the tunnel! We are starting to see the light of the Torato shel Mashiah. All the great roshei yeshiva who came after the Holocaust, whether it was Rav Aharon Kotler in America or the Klausenberger Rebbe. The Rebbe lost all his children, but he went on! These Gedolei Yisrael built Torah! They went forward! And since the price paid by Klal Yisrael during the Holocaust was so expensive – they went not from mitah l’haim. During the Holocaust six million Jews were killed! Now, look at the result! The result is unstoppable!”

A Novel Interpretation

Looking around at the crowd, Rabbi Mansour said, “I would like to offer a novel interpretation in your honor, and it is based on a story that happened with me. Many years ago, a wealthy Syrian Jew asked me to accompany him to Eretz Yisrael, so I took him. When I asked him where he wants to go, he replied, ‘I want to go see Rav Chaim Kanievsky.’

“Now, of course, I know where Rav Chaim lives. I had been to the rabbi many times. I had been to his father, the Steipler. I bought my set of Kehillat Yakov from the Steipler himself.

“So we go. Now, this wealthy man has everything. And there we were, walking up the steps and he gets rust all over his hands from the rusty banister. The steps are creaking like a haunted mansion. When we open the door to walk in, the door squeaks. We enter a very austere, modest abode. The light bulbs are hanging. There are no [light] fixtures. The Rebbetzin comes out, ‘Come, let me show you the kitchen.’ The kitchen we see is a small little hole in the wall with a Bunsen burner, a small skillet with some eggs and tomatoes – the Rabbi’s lunch.

“This rich man cannot believe what he is seeing! And then we go in to see Rav Chaim. He is sitting there on this warm spring day at his shtender, his jacket off, tzitizit over his shirt, the window is open and he is learning, with a smile from ear to ear. We got brahot, of course…

“On the way out, this fellow start crying and he says to me, ‘This man has nothing, no physical [comforts] or anything material. How is it possible that I have everything, I have planes, helicopters, and all the money in the world, but I don’t have the simhat haim that he has?! I don’t have the joy, the contentment that this man has! How is it possible?’

“I replied, ‘Please don’t feel bad for him. He must have something that is more pleasurable than what you have! That’s all. He is not sacrificing at all. As a matter of fact, he thinks you are making the ultimate sacrifice because you haven’t yet found something sweeter! Therefore, what you are involved in, your addiction, doesn’t bring you the same bliss, the same joy. You don’t have to pray for Rav Chaim.. His quality of life is perfect!’

“Hello! When you study Torah, you are doing yourself a favor! Our ancestors have paid the price for this Torah! They paid a price with their blood.

Following Hashem

“When the Jewish people left Mitzrayim, Hashem said, ‘Lechtech Acharei bamidbar’ and we followed Him to the midbar because we knew He was going to take good care of us. Gd would not tell us to go to the midbar if He wouldn’t provide ananei kavod, mohn, and the well of Miriam.

“But in the Holocaust?! ‘Lechtech Acharei’ – to where? To Auschwitz, to Treblinka??!To Dachau? We got nothing! After the 2,000 years of galut, we still came back to Hashem and said we want more Torah. What did we get? We only gave our lives! Hashem broke us!

“Today’s Torah is ahava she’ein teluyah b’davar. On Pesah, after 210 years of slavery, we got something. We accepted the Torah. On Purim, after the decrees of Haman, we got something, we accepted the Torah. In the 2,000 years of Galut, we gave our lives and no one had any claims! We still go to the Daf HaYomi, the Amud HaYomi, the Daf HaYomi B’Halacha. We are still plugging away and we are still learning!

“That is the highest level! The highest level of commitment!

Mashiah is coming very soon! I am not a prophet. I have no inside information any more than any saddikim here. They can probably tell you more about what is going to happen. I know basic facts from what I read in the Talmud.

“I am just looking at forecast. All the simanim in Masechta Sota already came true including putting talmidei hahamim in prison. That was already predicted in the Torah. All the signs are here. All the simanim are coming together and I am glad that Panama did not miss the boat, that you didn’t miss the train!

Baruch Hashem you got in before it was too late. Not only did you get in, but you are doing very well! You caught up a lot! And I can testify! This event is not in The Club with your parents and grandparents. This is a new generation!

My blessing is ‘Ki Mi’Sion teitzei Torah.’ Your Grand Rabbi was Sion, his great sacrifice was planted on empty fallow ground and today we are reaping the benefits of ‘hazorim bedimah berinah yeksoru’ and I say on events like tonight, we can say, ‘laYehudim haysah orah v’simha v’sasson vikar!’”

“Panama Will Never be the Same Again!”

What happened next was also unique for the Panama community. A large part of the community including many of bnei Torah and bnei yeshiva gathered hands, coming together in a large circle and joined Naftali Kempe for a beautiful kumzitz.

The spiritual high and the inspiration were palpable as they sang with Naftali into the night. Many women remained in the Ezrat Nashim observing and swaying along with the moving music. It was a magnificent testament to their Ahavat haTorah. Perhaps the words of a prominent community leader said in the aftermath of the Dirshu event in Panama, says it all. “The day after the event, I went to pray in the kollel, and I met an avreich. This avreich told me, ‘You know, when we were saying Minha today, during Modim, do you know what I did? I thanked the Ribbono Shel Olam for sending this amazing event to Panama. Panama will never be the same again!”

“The Warmth of the People!”

During Rav Hofstedter’s stay in Panama, he visited many of the Torah institutions, yeshivot, the Bet Yakov, the cheder, and kollelim. His first visit was to the Talmud Torah where he was greeted with excited singing. The principal offered him the opportunity to ask the boys questions on what they were learning and Rav Hofstedter was amazed at their ready knowledge and instant answers to the questions they were asked. He then gave a small schmooze related to the weekly parshah. Rabbi Eli Avraham, who accompanied him, explained the miraculous nature of the renaissance seen by Rav Hofstedter. Many of the parents of the older grades never went to yeshiva, never had a Torah education, and now their children are able to recite entire Masechtot by heart.

When he came to the Beit Yakov of Panama, Rav Dovid was very moved by the respectful conduct and refinement of the Benot Yisrael. From there he proceeded to the Mehina, the yeshiva for boys around the ages of thirteen-fourteen and he also imparted words of hizuk to them.

One of the most inspiring visits was Rav Hofstedter’s visit to the yeshiva. The bahurim, still on a high from the previous night’s event, greeted Rav Hofstedter with spontaneous singing and dancing. Rav Hofstedter then delivered a mussar discourse full of words of encouragement and goal-setting suggestions. From there, he went to the kollel where he was asked by the Rosh Kollel to address the avreihim.

He then had a meeting with four of the prominent community and Torah leaders to discuss issues of communal relevance.

When Rav Hofstedter was asked by one of the community leaders which of all the visits made the greatest impression on him, he replied with just a few words, “The warmth of the people!” Yes, it was the warmth of the community members and the way the community had embraced the message that made the most profound impression!

Community Pulse – Should Our Schools Embrace or Limit Technology?

Our kids are the future of the community. We invest not only in them, but in their children and the generations to come. It is incumbent on us to be the best parents we can be, and I see many in our community take this challenge seriously. This month let’s look at  a tricky parenting topic – technology for our kids. When and how should technology be allowed, and  when should it be restricted?

Most parents recognize that technology is bad for our brains – especially for underdeveloped ones. So, maybe we should cut it out completely. Unfortunately, for a multitude of reasons, this option seems untenable. Technology has become part of our lives now, like it or not. Clearly, it’s been extremely useful for classrooms and learning in general, especially during Covid. It is not practical to avoid teaching our youth how to interact with technology because in the real world, it’s practically everywhere. Especially AI can be a game changer in almost all areas of business and even for home economics.

But, the risks are high. One concern is that if we now require technology for learning then how do we keep our youth safe from the dangers associated with certain types of technology? Also, do we hold the schools responsible for making and enforcing boundaries around technology or is it primarily a parent’s job? I posed these questions to my Instagram followers. Here are their responses.

Community Member #1

As a parent of teenagers and younger children, the topic of technology in our community schools is very concerning.  After COVID, families were suddenly thrust into a world of technology far beyond what most of us had previously experienced, and it quickly became clear that many of these changes were not benefiting our kids.

It was refreshing to see schools and the community begin to take initiative together. However, the conversation seems to have stalled. While many schools have implemented different rules and regulations regarding technology, these steps, although positive, are only a starting point.

For example, one school has asked parents to sign a contract stating that their family agrees not to give their child a smartphone until eighth grade. Another school is actively working to remove smartphones from the school building entirely. Meanwhile, other schools simply avoid acknowledging that smartphones exist at all. The reality, however, is that the phones are still there.

Children whose schools prohibit smartphones often still have them. They either leave them at home or hide them in their bags at school. When kids feel they must hide their phones to avoid consequences, it unintentionally teaches them that being dishonest is the way to navigate the rules. This is not a lesson any of us want to reinforce.

Schools may threaten consequences if phones are discovered, but punishment alone does not address the larger issue: children are not being taught how to use technology responsibly or safely.

Many parents also feel unequipped to handle this challenge. They may not fully understand how to introduce technology to their children in a safe and developmentally appropriate way. Some schools have begun pilot programs that teach students about online safety, including topics like stranger danger and the risks associated with technology. These are important steps.

However, as a community we need to go further. Instead of relying solely on rules or restrictions, we should focus on providing families with the tools and knowledge needed to introduce technology in a thoughtful, gradual, and responsible way.

Community Member #2

Our school is very vocal when it comes to technology. However, it has to start at home as a partnership with the parents. Unfortunately, I have personally had an issue with my child and group texting. As the bullying went on, many parents were not monitoring their children on their devices. I approached the school and they said they “could not parent the children.” While I agree with this, I also see it as a much larger issue. Technology and our children are quickly becoming extremely uncontrollable. If parents do not monitor their kids’ use of, technology, it will (and already does) cause a lot of harm. 

Community Member #3

Some schools even have a large screen in kindergarten classrooms – which I find crazy! Screens are in every single grade going forward. Some kids are wearing Apple watches to school and already have phones – and now they’re getting computer time in school at such a young age. I honestly think it’s just too much screen time. Shouldn’t school provide a break from screens?

Community Member #4

My kids are young now so I’ll have to cross this bridge when I get there. But I have a plan. I ‘m going to have a large computer desktop in the family room for homework. If the school requires laptops – no problem, but laptops stay in backpacks and will be for school only – not for home use. My kids will likely have phones because that is the way of the world. However, I won’t allow social media or WhatsApp- Group chats of any kind. They’re going to have to lift the phone to their ears and make some good old fashioned phone calls to connect with friends.  I feel that’s the safest way. The other side of the coin is if you don’t expose them enough when they are younger, they can get really hooked on technology when they’re old enough to self-govern. I’m aiming for controlled exposure, kind of like candy, which we enjoy in moderation. 

Community Member #5

I’m very pleased that my school has multiple meetings a year about having technology filters on all devices in the home. Also, they’re not allowed to have smartphones until a certain age. I feel like my school is on top of it and I’m grateful for that!

Community Member #6

I know one school that requires parents to pledge no smartphones until 8th grade. I wish more schools promoted this. At the end of the day, parents need to make rules for their own households and not just rely on the schools’ judgment. If parents were to band together that would be very helpful and empowering. That way, students wouldn’t feel left out, as their parents would be advocating for them. I think a lot of classroom management issues would be resolved if we banded together as a community to limit access to media that is too mature and anxiety inducing. Maybe some brave parents can take the initiative and suggest it to fellow parents who have kids in their kids’ grades.

Community Member #7

I have a high schooler – no restrictions (besides the obvious no phones in class rule). I don’t like it, but these kids grew up this way and aren’t as comfortable with textbooks as millennials were. They juggle it well and have less to carry around. They have access to everything when they need it. They never “forgot what they need in school.”

Community Member #8

As a parent, I wish kids would be taught safe ways to use technology instead of “tech is evil don’t touch it.” Let’s face it, the kids are going to be using it. We might as well teach them how to use it responsibly and safely. As an elementary school staffer (I work in a school office), those ChatGPT essays and assignments that kids hand in are obviously plagiarized. I definitely have not seen any upsides to it at all. I also hear a lot of the drama and fights that are happening on Snapchat, texting, etc.

Community Member #9

As a mom, I hate that summer homework is on a computer! What happened to getting a workbook sent home and the students actually have to write and show their work?

There’s something about hand written homework away from a screen that is simply superior. And if I leave them alone to do the work while I go shower or make dinner they click away and end up on YouTube or the like. It’s a gateway for them and I don’t see the pros outweighing the cons.

I think that as a community we recognize  that both our schools and parents are making efforts to navigate the new technology our kids are exposed to. This is an important issue that needs constant attention and effort. We are dealing with a new issue and we have to realize that  it’s going to take time and concerted effort to create regulatory systems that actually work. I am hopeful, because as a community, we have strong values and we have faith in our leaders to guide us. Bezrat Hashem  we will ultimately come up with workable solutions to address the new technology issues. Honestly, I’m praying we won’t have to because Mashiach will come soon and abolish the evils amongst us. But until then, it’s incumbent on parents and schools to stay vigilant to protect the generations to come. 

Signing off until next time,

Frieda Schweky!Frieda is an event and portrait photographer. Check Frieda out on Instagram @friedaschwekyphoto For photography inquiries or article topic suggestions email her friedaschweky@gmail.com.

When the Walk to Shul Stops Feeling Ordinary

Why Brooklyn’s Jewish Community Must Speak Up Now

Linda Argalgi Sadacka

In Brooklyn’s Jewish neighborhoods, certain scenes are so familiar that we rarely pause to notice them.

On Shabbat morning, fathers walk with their sons toward shul. Mothers guide small children down the block. Teenagers drift toward friends already waiting outside synagogue doors. Grandparents move more slowly along the same sidewalks they have walked for decades, sometimes leaning on a cane, sometimes arm in arm with a spouse or child.

In neighborhoods like Flatbush, Midwood, Gravesend, and the surrounding communities, the walk to shul is not simply routine. It is one of the quiet, defining rhythms of Jewish life.

No one used to think twice about it.

New Question of Safety

Which is why the question many Brooklyn families now quietly ask would have sounded unimaginable not long ago: will the walk to shul always feel safe?

For generations, Brooklyn represented something powerful for Jewish life. It was a place where Jewish families could practice their faith openly, build institutions, and raise children with the confidence that their synagogues were places of prayer, dignity, and community.

But since October 7, the atmosphere surrounding Jewish institutions in New York has shifted in ways that many families feel every week.

Sometimes the change is subtle. Sometimes it is unmistakable.

Security outside Jewish schools has increased. Synagogues have become more vigilant. Parents walking with their children to services find themselves paying closer attention to their surroundings.

A Pivotal Event

For many Brooklyn residents, the moment when that tension became impossible to ignore came during the protest outside Congregation Shaare Zion on Ocean Parkway, when demonstrators gathered outside the synagogue in response to a planned appearance by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Supporters also arrived, and police were forced to separate the groups as tensions escalated. Clashes broke out, arrests were made, and the event was eventually canceled.

For those watching the scene unfold, the most unsettling aspect was not the political disagreement itself. New Yorkers are accustomed to protests. The city has always been a place where people gather to express strong views about global events.

What made this moment different was where it was happening. This was not a demonstration outside a government building or a public plaza. It was unfolding outside a synagogue where families had gathered for a community event and where worshippers regularly come to pray.

Once protests move to the doors of houses of worship, the nature of the confrontation changes.

Sanctity of the Synagogue

A synagogue is not a ministry or a parliament. The people walking through its doors are not policymakers or negotiators. They are parents bringing children to services, elderly congregants attending prayer, and families participating in the rhythms of Jewish life.

Yet the protest outside Shaare Zion was not an isolated moment. Similar scenes have taken place outside Jewish institutions across New York, including outside Park East Synagogue in Manhattan, where protesters gathered while congregants attempted to attend services.

Moments like these raise a troubling question: if houses of worship become routine protest sites, what happens to the ordinary act of entering a synagogue?

Children absorb these moments in ways adults sometimes overlook.

A child approaching synagogue should be thinking about prayer, about friends waiting inside, about the warmth of community. That child should not be processing hostility directed toward the place where their family gathers to worship.

The elderly feel this tension as well.

Anyone who has watched older congregants make their way slowly toward synagogue understands how vulnerable that walk can already be. Many move carefully. Some rely on assistance. To place them in the middle of emotionally charged demonstrations is not merely inconvenient. It is deeply unsettling.

Buffer Zones

The debate over buffer zones around houses of worship grew out of precisely these concerns.

Within a week of the October 7 attacks, as protests began spreading throughout New York City, I reached out to members of Mayor Eric Adams’s staff to raise the idea of establishing buffer zones around houses of worship. Watching demonstrations escalate so quickly, it seemed clear that the city needed to think several steps ahead.

The proposal never advanced to the level of serious policy discussion.

Fast forward to City Hall, where the New York City Council recently held a nearly ten-hour hearing debating legislation that would allow the NYPD to establish limited buffer zones around houses of worship and schools.

The proposal, part of a broader effort introduced by Council Speaker Julie Menin to combat rising anti-Semitism and hate crimes, does not prohibit protest. Demonstrators would still be able to assemble and express their views.

What the legislation seeks to do is to ensure that protests do not take place directly at the entrances of houses of worship where worshippers must pass to enter.

For many members of the Jewish community, that distinction is both reasonable and necessary.

Community Members Take a Stand

During the hearing, several voices from the community articulated that concern directly.

Community activist Abie Hamra addressed lawmakers and made a straightforward point: the First Amendment protects freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, but those rights do not extend to blocking access to houses of worship or interfering with another person’s ability to pray.

Cities impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions all the time. Ensuring safe access to houses of worship should not be controversial.

District leader Joey Saban also emphasized the importance of legislation introduced by Senator Sam Sutton. In addition to serving in the Assembly, Saban is also Senator Sutton’s Chief of Staff.

“The buffer zone legislation introduced by Senator Sutton is precisely why it is so important that we have a seat at the table,” Saban said. “Through his leadership we have been able to introduce a major piece of legislation that will have a direct effect on keeping our community safe at a critically fragile time for the Jewish community in New York.”

I was invited to testify during the hearing as well. Because I was available earlier in the morning and could not remain until my scheduled speaking slot later in the day, I submitted my testimony to the Council by email.

Addressing Arguments by Opponents of Buffer Zones

In my testimony I addressed an argument raised by several opponents of the legislation.

During the discussion, much of the justification for protests centered on claims that certain religious institutions host events connected to political or international disputes. People may strongly disagree with those issues, and protest is a protected and important part of democracy. But the individuals walking into a synagogue, church, or mosque are not policymakers or negotiators. They are ordinary people coming to pray.

If disagreement with an idea becomes justification for confronting people at the doorway of a house of worship, then no doorway remains neutral ground.

Parents arrive pushing strollers. Grandparents move slowly with walkers. Families come seeking prayer, comfort, and community. They should not have to pass through shouting crowds or emotionally charged demonstrations simply to enter a religious space. At that point, it ceases to be protest and becomes intimidation.

Buffer zones do not silence protest. Demonstrators remain visible and heard. What buffer zones do is create a margin of space so that worshippers are not forced into confrontation simply to practice their faith.

Devorah Halberstam and Inna Vernikov

Among those who also addressed lawmakers was Devorah Halberstam, whose son Ari was murdered in a terrorist attack on the Brooklyn Bridge in 1994. For decades she has worked to combat anti-Semitism and advocate for Jewish safety in New York.

Speaking during the hearing, she urged lawmakers to pass the legislation for Ari, a”h, and ensure that houses of worship remain places where families can gather without fear.

Council Member Inna Vernikov has also expressed support for protecting access to houses of worship, emphasizing that while protest is a protected right, intimidation that interferes with the free practice of religion should not be tolerated.

Troubling Trends

Still, beyond individual statements, many Jewish New Yorkers are concerned about a broader convergence of troubling trends.

Public sympathy for groups that openly celebrated the October 7 massacre has appeared at protests and across social media. At the same time, debates about policing and enforcement have left some communities questioning whether sufficient resources exist to respond when demonstrations escalate.

When sympathy for extremist violence, uncertainty about enforcement, and the absence of clear protections around houses of worship collide, the result can feel like a dangerous vacuum.

And that vacuum is felt most clearly at the doors of synagogues.

If the ordinary rhythms of Jewish life begin to feel uncertain, the consequences ripple outward. Parents hesitate. Children absorb the tension. The sense of security that once defined community life begins to erode.

That is why this moment cannot be met with quiet concern alone. Brooklyn’s Jewish community must make its voice heard.

Speak Up!

Residents should contact their City Council members and state representatives and tell them clearly that protecting access to houses of worship must remain a priority.

Reasonable buffer zones are not about silencing protest. They are about ensuring that families can enter synagogues without intimidation.

New Yorkers can identify their elected officials by entering their address here: https://www.mygovnyc.org.

The message should be simple. Support reasonable buffer zones around houses of worship so that worshippers can pray without fear.

Congregants should also speak with their rabbanim and community leaders and encourage them to publicly support these protections. When lawmakers hear directly from the families who fill Brooklyn’s synagogues every week, the issue becomes impossible to ignore.

The demonstration outside Shaare Zion should not become normal in Brooklyn.

The hostility seen outside Park East Synagogue should not become the expectation for Jewish families entering houses of worship anywhere in this city.

The walk to shul should remain what it has always been, a peaceful expression of faith – not an act of courage. And ensuring that it stays that way requires the community to speak up now.

From the Files of the Bet Din – Right of First Refusal?

The Case

Charles put his private home on the market for sale. Hymie, his next-door neighbor, was interested in the property and offered to match any price Charles received from the outside. By word of mouth, Charles found Ralph, a customer who was willing to pay 2.7 million dollars upfront for the property and go to closing within two weeks. Charles contacted Hymie and notified him of Ralph’s offer.  Hymie agreed to match the purchase price. However, he requested a mortgage contingency contract with a thirty-day window to obtain a loan from the bank. Hymie reassured Charles that he was in good standing with the bank and was probably eligible to receive a loan, but Charles rejected Hymie’s offer in favor of Ralph’s immediate cash payment. Charles signed with Ralph and accepted a deposit for the sale.

Hymie was disheartened by the refusal of his long-time friend and neighbor, and he reached out to other community members to intervene on his behalf. As a result, Charles had a change of heart and verbally agreed to sell his property to Hymie with a mortgage contingency. Charles contacted Ralph and notified him of the latest developments and unilaterally sent him back his deposit.

At first, Ralph refused to hear any of the details of the story and was prepared to enforce his contract. Hymie got involved then, contacting Ralph and claiming that as a next-door neighbor he had a right of first refusal of the property. He further insisted that by Torah law Ralph was required to walk away from the deal. At this point, Ralph did not want the argument to escalate and suggested the matter be resolved in Bet Din. The three signed on for the customary binding of arbitration and presented their cases to our Bet Din.

Who is entitled to purchase the property, Hymie or Ralph?  How should the Bet Din rule and why?

Torah Law

According to the ruling of the Shulhan Aruch, a next-door neighbor maintains the right of first refusal in the event the adjoining property to his home is up for sale. The rationale for this ruling is based on a verse in the Torah that requires one at times to go beyond the letter of the law for the sake of his brother. Since a next-door neighbor stands to gain significantly from purchasing the adjoining property, it is incumbent on an outside buyer to allow the neighbor the right of first refusal. In the event the outside buyer purchases the property without legal confirmation from the neighbor, a Bet Din will elect to evict him from the property, and allow the neighbor to make the acquisition.

The above ruling is subject to numerous provisions and restrictions and a competent halachic authority must be consulted before awarding a neighbor the right to purchase the adjoining property to his home. In instances in which the seller is posed with a disadvantage if he sells to the neighbor and not the outside buyer the law of “right of first refusal” is not applicable. Numerous scenarios are discussed by the great Sages of the Talmud that illustrate common disadvantages, including a neighbor who is willing to match the purchase price of an outside buyer, but requests a mortgage contingency. Since the outside buyer is ready to close immediately the neighbor is denied the right to purchase. Albeit, if the seller is willing to wait for his neighbor to come up with the funds needed, the outside buyer is required to step away from the deal in the meantime.

Leading halachic authorities debate whether the above ruling is applicable in instances in which at first the seller denied the neighbor on account of his mortgage contingency request, only to later change his mind in favor.  Early halachic sources rule that once the seller legally commits to an outside buyer willing to close immediately, he may no longer reverse his decision and sell the property to his neighbor. Since the outside buyer established a legal holding on the property, he is entitled to complete his purchase without moral concern for the neighbor. Although another reputable halachic opinion rules to the contrary, this latter opinion is nevertheless overruled.

 As aforementioned, an outside buyer is removed from the property if he halachically violated the rights of the adjoining neighbor. Nevertheless, in instances in which there is a halachic debate whether a neighbor is presently entitled to evict the outside buyer, the neighbor is rejected. Since the outside buyer is already in possession of the property, the neighbor may not claim rights of ownership in case of a halachic debate of the Sages. Rather the outside buyer in possession of the property can keep his purchase relying on the opinion that supports his position.

Endnotes: Baba Metziah 108b, Shulhan Aruch Hoshen Mishpat 175, Sema 175:7, Teshuvat HaRashba 2:85, Pithei Teshuva 175:11, Divrei Shalom H.M. 8, pg.13, Shulhan Aruch Hoshen Mishpat 175:45.

VERDICT: Too Late

Our Bet Din ruled in favor of Ralph and denied Hymie the neighbor the right to purchase Charles’s home. As mentioned in Torah law, Ralph purchased the home only after Charles legally rejected Hymie because he was unable to close immediately. Since Charles was not required to wait for Hymie to get an approval for a mortgage, and furthermore there was no guarantee the bank would extend him a loan, the law of “right of first refusal” is not applicable. Hence, although Charles later changed his mind, it was simply too late. Once Hymie lost the legal right to purchase, it cannot be reinstated. Hence, Charles is required to accept the return of the deposit and close the sale of his property with Ralph. As mentioned in Torah law, leading halachic authorities rule that although Charles is now willing to sell the property to Hymie his neighbor, at this point, Ralph has no further moral obligation to Hymie and is entitled to his acquisition.

In Loving Memory of Vera Bat Carol, A”H

YOU BE THE JUDGE

The Rightful Heir

Jack wrote a handwritten last will and testament back in 2007. Upon his passing in 2019, the will was found with Jack’s papers in his safety deposit box.  The will was not prepared by a lawyer nor was it notarized or signed by witnesses. Jack simply affixed his signature to the bottom of a briefly written statement. In the will, Jack offered to gift his private home to the child that provides full-time room and board his son Joey, a special child. In 2007 when Jack wrote the will his only daughter was not yet married. In 2019, prior to Jack’s passing, his daughter, then married, took Joey into her home for nearly six months before sending him off to a facility that provides for all of Joey’s needs. Jack’s daughter and son-in-law presented the handwritten document to our Bet Din claiming that their father legally gifted them his home since they provided room and board for Joey. Jack’s two sons acknowledged that they were aware of the document their father wrote before their sister provided room and board for their brother Joey, but they were nevertheless unwilling to transfer the property over to their sister.  The two brothers defended that it was not their father’s intent to gift his daughter the home for a mere six months of room and board. They explained that back in 2007 the circumstances were different and there was a real concern for Joey’s welfare.

Who should inherit the father’s home? How should the Bet Din rule and why?